Trump to unlock $41.2B starting with $AMZN

💰 The Economic Loss Numbers (To Add to Your Write-Up) Here are the hard figures you can insert into the "Real-World Impact" or "Conclusion" sections of your petition to show this is a systemic economic drain, not just a personal annoyance. 1. The Scale of the Problem · 35 Million: The approximate number of phone numbers recycled annually in the U.S.. This represents 35 million potential account lockouts or security breaches every year. · 171 out of 259: The number of recycled numbers (in a Princeton study) that were tied to existing active accounts at major websites, giving the new owner a direct path to hijack the account. 2. The Fraud & Loss Impact While "lockout" itself isn't always reported as fraud, it is the gateway to Account Takeover (ATO). · $15.6 Billion: Reported losses from Account Takeover fraud in the U.S. in 2024 alone. · $23 Billion: Estimated total cost of ATO fraud to U.S. adults in 2023. · Operational Cost: Every time a user is forced to call support for a lockout (or a password reset), it costs the company roughly $70 to $87 in helpdesk time and lost productivity. When multiplied by millions of locked-out users, this is a massive hidden tax on the economy. 3. The "Hostage" Asset Value Users aren't just losing emails; they are losing purchased assets (Kindle libraries, movies, software licenses). · While there is no single statistic for "digital goods locked behind old phone numbers," the Digital Legacy Market (the industry trying to solve digital asset inheritance) is valued at $25.63 Billion in 2026, precisely because digital assets are becoming the primary store of value. Locking users out of these assets due to a recycled number artificially destroys consumer wealth. "With roughly 35 million numbers recycled annually, the FCC's current regulations create a systemic vulnerability. This isn't just an inconvenience; it feeds into an Account Takeover fraud crisis that cost Americans $15.6 billion** in 2024 alone, while forcing companies to waste an estimated **$70+ per incident on avoidable helpdesk tickets for users who are permanently locked out of their purchased digital assets."

Packaging to Cash $

Get me hired.

Walmart ($WMT) is reading my blog posts — and implementing my product packaging changes globally. By my analysis, that's over $1 billion a year in savings.

Hire me, and I'll do at least 2x that.

Until then, I'm stopping publication. The savings Walmart is taking could belong to $PEP, $KO, $IMKTA, $TGT, $KR, $AMZN — and others.

One example: I can reduce Lay's packaging 2% more while increasing sales +6%.

— Jason Bulsa

Honest jar initiative

"Honest Jar" Initiative — Concise Version

The tie: Overpackaging and shrinkflation are one problem: families pay more per ounce and more plastic gets shipped and thrown away.

The incentive (voluntary, carrot-only):

· Regulatory fast-track: Expedited FDA/EPA review for qualifying package changes (thinner lids, ridge-less caps, right-sized jars).

· Federal purchasing preference: Commissaries and agencies buy from pledge signers — real revenue.

· Tariff relief: ~$0.02–0.05 per jar on resin saved, tied to verified packaging cuts.

· Public scorecard: Ranks brands by cost per ounce and packaging weight.

To qualify: honest net-weight disclosure, measurable packaging reduction (target: 10% less plastic per unit), per-unit packaging reporting.

—

Below is my proposal written as the announcement I'd like to see — a draft, not a real White House release:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

White House Launches "Honest Jar" Initiative to Cut Grocery Bills and Plastic Waste Together

Administration challenges manufacturers to stop hiding shrinkflation behind oversized packaging — rewarding efficiency with fast-track approvals and federal purchasing preference.

WASHINGTON — Today the administration announced the "Honest Jar" initiative, a voluntary partnership calling on food manufacturers to cut packaging weight and disclose net weight honestly — lowering costs for families and cutting plastic waste at once.

"When a jar looks the same but holds less, families pay more per ounce and throw away the same plastic," the President said. "We're telling companies: compete on efficiency, not tricks. Cut the packaging, tell the truth on the label, and we'll cut the red tape — and put federal purchasing behind you."

Participants commit to 10% less plastic per unit, honest net-weight disclosure, and per-unit packaging reporting. In return: expedited regulatory review, federal purchasing preference, ~$0.02–0.05 per-jar tariff relief on resin saved, and a spot on a public efficiency scorecard.

"This is a win for families, a win for manufacturers, and a win for taxpayers," the President said.

My note: this survives only as a cost-and-honesty story — framed as plastics reduction, it collides with the administration's own straw order.

The new strip club worker, Wire for $

Get Paid to Collect (Not Just Scrap) · Offer paid junk removal — get paid to haul it away, then profit from scrap/resale · Junk removal jobs in SC pay roughly $10–$20/hr plus tips/bonuses at companies like College Hunks, or $17–$18/hr for technician roles Maximize Current Scrap (SC price examples) · Only strip wire thicker than your pinky — insulated wire sells for less than bare copper · Bare Bright Copper: ~$3.75/lb; #1 Insulated Wire: ~$2.54/lb; #2 Insulated Wire: ~$1.50/lb · Separate high-grade boards (motherboards, CPUs) from low-grade — value difference can be significant · Fix easy appliance issues before scrapping — working items sell for more than metal value (Electric Motors scrap: only ~$0.25/lb) Buying a House · Look into first-time homebuyer and down payment assistance programs in her area · SC Housing offers a 15-year forgivable down payment assistance loan for eligible buyers · USDA Rural Housing in SC: $0 down payment, 620 minimum credit score, household income limit generally $122,800/year for 1–4 members in most counties · Income limits for SC Housing programs in non-targeted counties: roughly $90,500–$112,200 for 1–2 persons depending on county Business Support for Women (if in SC) · SC Community Loan Fund: loans typically $5,000 to $1 million for underserved borrowers including women-owned businesses · Small Business Assistance Corporation microloans: up to $50,000, 7-year term at roughly 7.5% interest · LiftFund SC: startup loans up to $50,000, expansion loans up to $250,000 (focus on women/minority-owned) · She Leads SC Grant: $5,000 grant for women-led SC businesses boardsort.com

New ways to save Gas

Novel ways to cope with high gas prices: · Double fill-up hack: 2 cars share 1 pump transaction to both get a grocery loyalty discount. · AI deal-hunting: Using ChatGPT to find grocery savings (~$100/month for 1 family). · Pump preset codes: Viral TikTok codes to avoid $100+ debit card holds. · Barbie Camper commuter: trash-picked a broken Power Wheels toy, installed a two-gallon power-washer engine, and now fills up for ~$3 instead of $90 · "Staycation" marketing: A camp director pitches overnight camp as a gas-saving alternative to shuttling kids around. · Gas card giveaways: Tourism agencies and churches distributing free fuel cards. * remove roof rack rails to save 12%

Improve dish liquid soap bottles design changes

Palmolive Ultra Pure & Clear

Packaging:

· The cap could be thinner — once screwed on, the bottle reinforces the plastic, so it doesn't need to be as thick.

· The flip-open cap doesn't need to be as thick either.

· The bottle itself could be thinner.

· The pour hole in the cap could be smaller to control the flow better.

· The labels could be clear, and less glue could be used on them.

Formula:

· The number one ingredient is water, which is an unnecessary "extra." The product could be concentrated 2–3x more than it is now.

· Even if the bottle isn't full, the customer can simply add water when they get it to reach the desired strength.

Benefits to Palmolive:

· Cost savings: Less resin, less packaging, and far less water to ship — saving on raw materials and freight.

· Lighter shipments: Thinner caps and bottles plus less water means lower shipping costs and a smaller carbon footprint.

· Estimated profit increase: These changes could plausibly add an estimated $0.15–$0.30 profit per bottle. Across millions of units sold annually, that could mean tens of millions of dollars in additional profit.

· Better value for customers: More cleaning power per bottle and less frequent repurchasing builds loyalty.

These changes would save Palmolive money, reduce environmental impact, and improve the product. I'd love to see the company take them into consideration.

Max* income opportunities

Business acquisition options 1) consulting and productized services, which offer the highest near-term returns; 2) acquisition, given sufficient capital or credit; 3) vertical SaaS, which has great potential but lower odds; and 4) solo expertise or high-income careers. > 1. Specialized B2B service → productized agency** | Roughly **$1M–$20M+/yr** in revenue; exceptional firms can exceed that. Owner earnings can reach seven figures, but usually only with a team and strong margins. | **$1k–$25k** to test; more to hire and scale. | **2–8 weeks** | **2–12 months** | **1–4 years** | **1–4 years** | Risks: weak sales, client concentration, hiring and delivery quality. Moat: a narrow specialty, proven results, repeatable processes, trusted referrals, and switching costs. | | **2. Acquire a profitable small business** | Commonly a **$1M–$50M+/yr** business-building path; much larger outcomes usually require multiple acquisitions or unusually strong growth. Owner earnings depend heavily on purchase price, debt, and the owner’s role. | Often **substantial** equity, diligence, and working capital; amount varies greatly by deal. | **At acquisition close** | **At close**, if the business already produces it | **1–5 years** through improvement or add-ons | **1–5 years** | Risks: overpaying, hidden liabilities, customer loss, debt pressure, and operational dependence on the seller. Moat: existing customers, reputation, permits, location, contracts, and operating know-how. | | **3. Vertical software / SaaS** | **$10M–$100M+** in annual recurring revenue is possible for a standout company; reaching it is uncommon. | **$5k–$100k+** for a lean validation/build; substantially more if hiring or scaling quickly. | **1–6 months** | **6–24 months** | **2–6 years** | **2–6 years** | Risks: building before confirming demand, customer churn, competition, security, and long time to profitability. Moat: workflow integration, proprietary data, distribution, high switching costs, and trusted compliance capabilities. | | **4. Expert practice / high-value consulting** | Often **$200k–$1M+/yr** in solo revenue; substantially more if converted into a firm, licensing model, or product. | **$500–$10k** in many cases, excluding required credentials or licensing. | **1–8 weeks** | **1–12 months** | Usually requires a firm, product, or unusual pricing model; **2–5+ years** | **1–5 years** | Risks: dependence on your time and reputation, inconsistent leads, and credential or regulatory requirements. Moat: rare expertise, referrals, demonstrated outcomes, and trusted judgment. | These are broad ranges, not industry-wide guarantees. In particular, a software company can have a far higher ceiling than a solo practice, while a solo practice may have a much better chance of producing income quickly. ### First five actions for each **1. Specialized B2B service → productized agency** 1. List problems you can solve credibly, or can learn to solve quickly, for businesses. 2. Choose one customer type and one costly, measurable problem. 3. Interview 10–15 prospective buyers; ask how they solve it now and what it costs them. 4. Offer a small paid pilot with a specific deliverable and outcome. 5. Document delivery, seek referrals, and standardize only after you see repeat demand. **2. Acquire a profitable small business** 1. Set your limits for equity, debt, personal guarantees, and owner workload. 2. Pick a sector you understand well enough to evaluate and operate. 3. Learn how to inspect financial statements, customer concentration, contracts, and working capital. 4. Speak with lenders and an experienced transaction attorney/accountant before making offers. 5. Screen multiple businesses and independently verify claims before committing. In the U.S., SBA 7(a) loans can support certain changes of ownership, and the SBA lists a maximum loan amount of $5 million; availability is not approval, and individual lenders underwrite applicants and deals. ([sba.gov](https://www.sba.gov/loans/7a-loans/?utm_source=openai)) **3. Vertical software / SaaS** 1. Select a narrow industry and a repetitive, expensive workflow. 2. Interview prospective users before writing software. 3. Sell a manual or no-code pilot to test willingness to pay. 4. Build only the smallest product that removes the validated pain. 5. Track retention and customer acquisition cost before investing heavily in growth. **4. Expert practice / high-value consulting** 1. Identify a costly decision or problem where you have credible expertise. 2. Define a specific buyer, outcome, scope, and price. 3. Create a simple offer and reach out to relevant contacts or referral sources. 4. Deliver excellent work and record results—with permission—to build proof. 5. Raise prices or narrow the specialty as demand and evidence improve. ## Ranking: a practical expected-value proxy Your formula—**revenue ceiling × probability ÷ (capital + time)**—is a useful intuition, but it cannot be calculated consistently as written: capital and time have different units, and revenue ceiling ignores costs, taxes, debt, and the likelihood and timing of actually reaching that ceiling. With your personal details blank, assigning precise probabilities would create false precision. For an unknown founder with modest capital, I’d use this **qualitative, risk-adjusted ranking**: 1. **Specialized service → productized agency:** best default starting point. It can generate paid evidence quickly, usually needs less capital, and can later fund hiring or software. 2. **Expert practice / consulting:** may rank first if you already have rare, marketable expertise and a network; it can produce cash quickly, but solo income is constrained by your time. 3. **Small-business acquisition:** can move ahead of those if you have capital, credit, operational skill, and access to a genuinely sound deal. Without those, the financial downside is considerable. 4. **Vertical SaaS:** highest software-style ceiling, but I would not rank it first without evidence of customer demand, strong distribution, or a domain advantage. ### My default top 3 - **Start with a specialized B2B service** if you can identify a painful business problem and sell a pilot. It’s a practical way to learn what customers will pay for before betting heavily on a product. - **Build an expert practice** if your existing skills or credentials already solve an urgent, expensive problem. That can provide the fastest path to meaningful owner income. - **Consider acquisition** only if you can withstand the debt and diligence burden and have relevant operating support. SBA financing may be one route, not a substitute for deal analysis. A strong sequence for some founders is **service first → repeatable process → software or acquisition later**. The service earns revenue while revealing what customers repeatedly need.