iChange2
Make America Great Again. Stop Liberal Democrat Con Man Rap e
Friday, October 23, 2026
Honest jar initiative
Wednesday, October 21, 2026
The new strip club worker, Wire for $
Sunday, October 18, 2026
New ways to save Gas
Sunday, October 11, 2026
Improve dish liquid soap bottles design changes
Max* income opportunities
Saturday, October 10, 2026
Shrink the Box: Fast Food's Packaging Win
My frozen meal box had room to spare. The paper sleeve on my taco was bigger than the taco. So I told the companies: make it smaller.
The asks
- Taco Bell: make the sleeves for soft and hard tacos 10% smaller.
- Costco: make the hot dog bags 10% smaller.
- Banquet: make the frozen bowl and its box about 20% smaller, unless the extra space is filled with more meat.
Why small cuts matter
Ten percent less paper on one taco is nothing. Multiply it by the millions of tacos and hot dogs sold in a year and it adds up. Less material goes into each wrapper. More wrappers fit in each shipment. Less ends up in the trash.
None of this needs a new invention. The companies already make the packaging. They would only change the size.
The catch
Oversized packaging can make a product look bigger than it is. A big box on the shelf suggests a lot of food inside. That is why I did not simply ask Banquet for a smaller box. If the box stays big, fill it with more food. Either way, the customer gets a better deal and the packaging stops hiding empty space.
How I sent it
I used the companies' web forms and a consumer care email. Each message was short and specific. I named the product, said what was too big, and gave the percentage I wanted. I did not write a long complaint or explain my whole day.
I have no replies to report yet. I am sending these because the ask costs me a few minutes, and a company can act on it.
Takeaway
Next time packaging looks oversized, tell the company with a specific number, like 10% smaller. Specific asks get read. Vague complaints get filed.
Why Does a Resort Room Still Have Wi-Fi That Won't Stay Connected?
Four days at a beachfront resort. I had to log back into the Wi-Fi multiple times a day, and my tablet couldn't get past the sign-in screen at all.
What happened
On my tablet, the sign-in page would not load. I tried again and again. Nothing.
My other devices did connect. Then they got kicked off, and I had to sign in again. This repeated every day of the stay.
The resort shares its grounds with a neighboring property. Each one runs its own network with its own log-in. Walk a few steps and you are on a different system.
Why hotel Wi-Fi is like this
- Captive sign-in pages that break on some devices.
- Limits on how many devices one guest can connect.
- Short session timeouts that log you out and make you start over.
- Networks split between properties that guests treat as one place.
None of this is hard to fix. It just isn't a priority until guests complain.
What I asked for
I asked for two changes. First, a simpler sign-in that remembers your device for the whole stay. Second, one shared login across connected properties, so guests don't juggle two networks.
The complaint was escalated to the brand's executive customer relations team. I'll report back if I hear anything concrete.
It's not just one hotel
I have raised Wi-Fi access with convention hotels before. Attendees at a convention want to look up schedules, share what they are seeing, and use event apps. They can't do any of that if the connection keeps dropping. The same problems show up in different buildings.
Takeaway
- Ask before you book. How long does a Wi-Fi session last? How many devices are allowed? Get the answers in writing if you can.
- Force the sign-in page. If it won't load, open a browser and go to a plain http site. Many networks only redirect you to the sign-in page from an unsecured address.
- Bring a backup. A phone hotspot saves you when the hotel network fails.
- Report it during the stay. Do it in writing, not just at the front desk. Say what failed, how often, and how it affected you. Then ask for compensation.
A complaint made after you have checked out is easy to ignore. One made while the problem is happening is much harder to dismiss.